And not just overrated, but horribly so?
I just borrowed it from my friend tonight as I'm looking for other PS2 games to play. I saw it on IGN's top 100 games of all time and figured it should be a fun distraction until I get some new Wii games or he asks for it back (which probably won't be for a long time as he's been playing COD4 on computer now). While I thought that the graphics looked a little sparse at first glance through the introduction sequence, I was fine with that, as I feel graphics have little bearing on how great a game is.
Unfortunately, I like it when the graphics don't hurt my eyes. The game seems very blurry to me, so blurry that it was enough to make me think I needed to see an optometrist. The character seems to respond to commands very sluggishly, and it almost seems like this is a poor attempt at a copy of a 3D Zelda game. Heck, Ocarina of Time responded much better IMO.
Sometimes when I'm riding the horse around the world (which is very large and would be impressive if...) half the screen just goes completely blue for a bit. I cannot for the life of me figure out how this game has a 91% on gamerankings. My eyes really do hurt from playing it, it's like the framerate never even makes it to 30 FPS, but dips down to 10. Sure, I get that some of these are issues due to the enormity of the world, but come on. I would say that the combat with the colossi is fun, but again the overall sluggishness of both the gameplay and the graphics makes it much less fun than it's capable of.
I realize this games a few years old, but does anybody else agree/disagree? Is there maybe something wrong with my PS2?